Livrare gratuită pentru comenzile peste 349,00 lei.

Verifică starea comenzii

Faceți parte dintr-o comunitate de iubitori de cărți din întreaga lume și beneficiați de o mulțime de avantaje Creați-vă un cont gratuit

Transport gratuit la punctele de livrare Pick Up peste 349.00 lei

Packeta 15.00 lei Cargus 28.00 lei Easybox 20.00 lei FAN 20.00 lei Punct FAN 16.00 lei Punct DPD 17.00 lei Curier Sameday 24.00 lei Curier DPD 25.00 lei

Contact

Cum să cumpăr

Ajutor

Contul meu

▸ Gol :-(

Livrare gratuită pentru comenzile peste 349,00 lei.

Violent Peace

Militarized Interstate Bargaining in Latin America

David R. Mares

Limba

engleză

Carte Carte broșată

Codul Libristo: 04557400

Editura Columbia University Press, februarie 2001

When is military force an acceptable tool of foreign policy? Why do democracies use force against ea... Descrierea completă

Codul Libristo: 04557400

107 b

231.44 lei

În depozitul extern Expediem în 9-15 zile

30 de zile pentru retur bunuri

Clienții au cumpărat de asemenea

Lita/Dangerous Curves Lita Ford

Audio CD

82.98 lei

Untersuchungen ber Die Schneidkraftminderung an Sch rfk belschneiden Durch Vibration Hubert Frenking

Carte broșată

440.89 lei

PASSION CHASSE - LANGUEDOC ROUSSILLON, CHASSEURS JE VOUS AIME DIVERS Videoclip

DVD

63.58 lei

La formación del Imperio romano PIERRE GRIMAL

Carte broșată

181.29 lei

Automapa Irsko 1:350 000

Hartă

72.24 lei

Diventa supernatural. Come fanno le persone comuni a realizzare cose straordinarie Joe Dispenza

Carte broșată

107.89 lei

When is military force an acceptable tool of foreign policy? Why do democracies use force against each other? David R. Mares argues that the key factors influencing political leaders in all types of polities are the costs to their constituencies of using force and whether the leader can survive their displeasure if the costs exceed what they are willing to pay. Violent Peace proposes a conceptual scheme for analyzing militarized conflict and supports this framework with evidence from the history of Latin America. His model has greater explanatory power when applied to this conflict-ridden region than a model emphasizing U.S. power, levels of democracy, or the balance of power. Mares takes conflict as a given in international relations but does not believe that large-scale violence must inevitably result, arguing that it is the management of conflict, and not necessarily its resolution, that should be the focus of students, scholars, and practitioners of international relations. Mares argues that deterrence represents the key to conflict management by directly affecting the costs of using force. Conflicts escalate to violence when leaders ignore the requisites for credible and ongoing deterrence. Successful deterrence, he suggests, lies in a strategy that combines diplomatic and military incentives, allowing competition among heterogenous states to be managed in a way that minimizes conflict and maximizes cooperation.