Nu se pretează? Nu contează! Puteți returna produsele în până la 30 de zile
Cu un voucher cadou nu veți da greș. În schimbul voucherului, destinatarul își poate alege orice din oferta noastră.
Până la 30 de zile pentru returnare
Philosophers are committed to objective understanding, but thehistory of philosophy demonstrates how frequently one philosophermisunderstands another. The most notorious such breakdown incommunication in twentieth-century philosophy was between Husserl andHeidegger. In the third volume of his history of the phenomenologicalmovement, Robert Denoon Cumming argues that their differences involvedifferences in method; whereas Husserl follows a "method ofclarification," with which he eliminates ambiguities by relying on anintentional analysis that isolates its objects, Heidegger rejects thecriterion of "clarity" and embraces ambiguities as exhibitingoverlapping relations. Cumming also explores the differences between howdeconstruction--Heidegger's procedure for dealing with otherphilosophers--is carried out when Heidegger interprets Husserl versuswhen Derrida interprets Husserl. The comparison enables Cumming toshow how deconstruction is associated with Heidegger's arrival at theend of philosophy, paving the way for the deconstructionist movement.