Livrare gratuită pentru comenzile peste 349,00 lei.

Verifică starea comenzii

Faceți parte dintr-o comunitate de iubitori de cărți din întreaga lume și beneficiați de o mulțime de avantaje Creați-vă un cont gratuit

Transport gratuit la punctele de livrare Pick Up peste 349.00 lei

Packeta 15.00 lei Serviciul de curierat Cargus 28.00 lei Easybox 20.00 lei FAN Courier 20.00 lei Punct FAN 16.00 lei Punct DPD 17.00 lei Curier DPD 25.00 lei

Contact

Cum să cumpăr

Ajutor

Contul meu

▸ Gol :-(

Livrare gratuită pentru comenzile peste 349,00 lei.

Free Riding

Richard Tuck

Limba

engleză

Carte Copertă tare

Codul Libristo: 04635144

Editura Harvard University Press, iunie 2008

One individual's contribution to a large collective project - such as voting in a national election... Descrierea completă

Codul Libristo: 04635144

161 b

346.59 lei

În depozitul extern Expediem în 14-21 zile

Până la 30 de zile pentru returnare

Clienții au cumpărat de asemenea

Hygiene de l'Oreille. 2e Edition Vincenzo Cozzolino

Carte broșată

84.98 lei

Traite des chiffres ou secretes manieres d'ecrire Blaise de Vigenere

Carte broșată

571.09 lei

Gaston (édition 2018) - Tome 15 - Le repos du gaffeur Franquin

Copertă tare

89.33 lei

MELODíAS CLáSICAS PARA ENTONAR Y ANALIZAR. 2 CURSO DE ENSEñANZAS BáSICAS GARCíA-PALAO REDONDO

Carte

132.56 lei

Banana Pancake Trail Philipp Mattheis

Carte broșată

70.16 lei

Konstitution, allergische Krankheiten der Knochen, Gelenke und Muskeln, Krankheiten aus äusseren physikalischen Ursachen, Ernährungskrankheiten, Vitam Friedrich Curtius

Carte broșată

265.95 lei

One individual's contribution to a large collective project - such as voting in a national election or contributing to a public television fund-raising campaign - often seems negligible. A striking proposition of contemporary economics and political science is that it would be an exercise of reason, not a failure of it, not to contribute to a collective project if the contribution is negligible, but to benefit from it nonetheless.But Richard Tuck wonders whether this phenomenon of free riding is a timeless aspect of human nature or a recent, historically contingent one. He argues for the latter, showing that the notion would have seemed strange to people in the nineteenth century and earlier and that the concept only became accepted when the idea of perfect competition took hold in economics in the early twentieth century.Tuck makes careful distinctions between the prisoner's dilemma problem, threshold phenomena such as voting, and free riding. He analyzes the notion of negligibility, and shows some of the logical difficulties in the idea - and how the ancient paradox of the sorites illustrates the difficulties.Tuck presents a bold challenge to the skeptical account of social cooperation so widely held today. If accepted, his argument may over time encourage more public-spirited behavior.