Livrare gratuită pentru comenzile peste 349,00 lei.

Verifică starea comenzii

Faceți parte dintr-o comunitate de iubitori de cărți din întreaga lume și beneficiați de o mulțime de avantaje Creați-vă un cont gratuit

Transport gratuit la punctele de livrare Pick Up peste 349.00 lei

Packeta 15.00 lei Cargus 28.00 lei Easybox 20.00 lei FAN 20.00 lei Punct FAN 16.00 lei Punct DPD 17.00 lei Curier Sameday 24.00 lei Curier DPD 25.00 lei

Contact

Cum să cumpăr

Ajutor

Contul meu

▸ Gol :-(

Livrare gratuită pentru comenzile peste 349,00 lei.

Loss Given Default Modeling: a Comparative Analysis

Name: Loss Given Default Modeling: a Comparative Analysis
Brand: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
SKU: 18715689
Price: 143.64 RON
Availability: InStock
Author: Olga Yashkir
ISBN: 9786202093750

Olga Yashkir

Yuri Yashkir

Limba

engleză

Carte Carte broșată

Codul Libristo: 18715689

Editura LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, noiembrie 2016

Several most popular Loss Given Default (LGD) models were investigated (LSM, Tobit, Three-Tiered Tob... Descrierea completă

Codul Libristo: 18715689

66 b

143.64 lei

În depozitul extern Expediem în 5-8 zile

30 de zile pentru retur bunuri

Clienții au cumpărat de asemenea

Charite sacerdotale, ou Lecons elementaires de theologie pastorale. Tome 2 DESURMONT-A

Carte broșată

192.46 lei

Les droits sexuels ou la destruction programmée de l’enfance et de la famille Sigaut

Carte broșată

138.66 lei

Die Sünde aber gebiert den Tod Andrea Schacht

Carte broșată

50.58 lei

Carte des Vignobles et Vins de France - Affiche 50x70cm

binding.

161.82 lei

leben // gestalten Ulf Kilian

Copertă tare

119.13 lei

Several most popular Loss Given Default (LGD) models were investigated (LSM, Tobit, Three-Tiered Tobit, Beta Regression, Inflated Beta Regression, Censored Gamma Regression) in order to compare their performance. We show that for a given input data set, the quality of the model calibration depends mainly on the proper choice of explanatory variables, but not on the fitting model. Model factors were chosen based on their correlation with historical LGDs of the calibration data set. Numerical values of non-quantitative parameters (industry, ranking, type of collateral) were introduced as their LGD average. We show that different debt instruments depend on different sets of model factors (from three factors for Revolving Credit or for Subordinated Bonds to eight factors for Senior Secured Bonds). Calibration of LGD models using distressed business cycle periods provide better fit than data from total available time span. Calibration algorithms and details of their realization using the R statistical package are presented. We demonstrate how LGD models can be used for stress testing. The results of this study can be of use to risk managers concerned with the Basel accord compliance.